Skip to content

FOIA Activity: 12 New Procedural or Substantive Decisions

by on April 3, 2014

We have added 12 decisions of a procedural or substantive nature filed between March 23, 2014 and March 29, 2014. These are associated with 12 FOIA cases pending in federal district court. Note that because there can be delays between the date a decision is made and when it shows up on PACER, this listing includes only decisions that appeared on PACER during this period.

Click on the date to view the full text of the decision. Click on a case title below to view other details for that case, including links to the docket report and complaint.

  1. CAE 2:2013cv02204Laborers International Union of North America Pacific Soutohwest Region v. U.S. Department of Energy
    • March 26, 2014: STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/25/14 ORDERING the parties hereby stipulate and agree that information regarding the three Power Equipment Operators, groups 3, 9, and 11, can be redacted from the certified payroll records at issue and will not be an issue to be determined in this litigation. (Becknal, R)
  2. CO 1:2011cv02544Evans v. Central Intelligence Agency
    • March 26, 2014: MINUTE ORDER granting [37] Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Freedom of Information Act, and Rule 7.1(a) Certification. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/26/2014.(klyon, )
  3. CO 1:2013cv01722Brown et al v. Perez
    • March 24, 2014: MINUTE ORDER denying [54] Motion to Vacate. The Final Pretrial Conference set for April 7, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. will go forward as scheduled. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/24/2014.(trlee, )
  4. CT 3:2011cv02009Vietnam Veterans of America Connecticut Greater Hartford Chapter 120 et al v. Defense et al
    • March 28, 2014: ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. [11] ) is hereby DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 03/28/2014. (Bowers, J.)
  5. DC 1:2010cv00027ADIONSER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
    • March 28, 2014: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 03/28/2014. (jth)
  6. DC 1:2012cv00931JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
    • March 27, 2014: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on March 27, 2014. (lcegs4)
  7. DC 1:2012cv01923RODRIGUEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
    • March 27, 2014: MEMORANDUM OPINION granting [15] Motion for Summary Judgment; denying [17] Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/27/2014. (lcrc2)
  8. DC 1:2013cv00141ODLAND et al v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
    • March 27, 2014: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION regarding cross motions for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 3/27/2014. (KD)
  9. FLM 5:2013cv00420Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Department of the Navy et al
    • March 26, 2014: ORDER denying without prejudice [16] Motion for telephonic hearing. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 3/26/2014. (JWM)
  10. NV 2:2010cv02040Black v. United States Department of Homeland Security
    • March 28, 2014: ORDER that [66] Plaintiff Jeffrey Black’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that [69] Department of Homeland Security’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Clerk is instructed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF – EDS)
  11. TXN 3:2012cv04528Stone v. United States Department of Justice
    • March 28, 2014: Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court grants [20] Defendant’s Second Amended Motion to Dismiss, denies as moot Defendants’ Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment, and dismisses without prejudice this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/28/2014) (jrr)
  12. WAE 2:2013cv03067Community Association for Restoration of the Environment Inc v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
    • March 27, 2014: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO STAY DISCOVERY. Defendants Motion for a Protective Order and Motion to Stay ECF No. [21] is GRANTED. Discovery is stayed until such time as the Court directs, after the Courts ruling on t he parties forthcoming motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Motion for a Telephonic Status Conference ECF No. [26] is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs Motion to Expedite ECF No. [28] is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
Advertisements

From → Decisions, FOIA, PACER

Leave a Comment

 

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: